Term dates Events Facilities. Fees Open Day. Staff Diploma to Degree. All courses show menu Course search How to apply.
Animation MA. Animation MA Farnham. MA A one-year course of advanced study for furthering your research skills and specialising within your discipline. Accredited by:. Course details. Integrated Pre-Masters if undertaken Get ready for your chosen postgraduate course with this preparatory year of specialist study. Term one Research and Critical Approaches: Animation You will explore the different modes of research related to the creative process, developing your skills in translating imagined film concepts into treatments, project proposals, screenplays and other forms of communicating film ideas.
Term two During term two you begin developing your MA project, evaluating and testing out the aims of your proposal over a sustained period of self-directed study. Term three In the third term of the course, you'll apply the knowledge gained through your research to create a final body of work.
Fee discounts and scholarships To support our students and alumni to progress to the next level of study, we have developed a new range of fee discounts across a range of courses. Read more about fee discounts. Course specifications Programme specification entry Student regulations Please note, syllabus content indicated is provided as a guide. Course connections. Careers An enormous range of career opportunities exist in animation, and typical careers in the industry include: Directors Producers Animators in commercials, films, broadcast, online media and games Editors Character designers Production designers Pre-vis artists Compositors Storyboard artists Post-production.
Further study You may want to undertake further study or research to specialise even more. Explore our Gradshow. Our Staff. Lesley Adams Programme Director Animation. Maryam Mohajer Lecturer Animation.
Jim Le Fevre Lecturer in Animation. Entry requirements. International and EU entry requirements To view the equivalent entry requirements for your country please select it in the list below.
Pick Your Country Please select Apply Now. Gagandeep Kalirai. Martin Pickles. Maryam Mohajer. Josh Saunders. Elmaz Ekrem. Patrick O'Mahony. James Wright. Visiting Lecturers. Stuart Hilton. Guest Lectures guest lecturers Alumni Alumni. Students Careers Graduate destinations. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Marina Koleva. A short summary of this paper. The Cyrillic Inscription from Edessa In part, this is due to the low level of literacy, which makes people more sensitive to communication power of the image, and in part because images are everywhere1.
During the Roman Imperial Age Greek Art is freely cited, and Greek models are accessible and recognizable to diverse strata within Roman society3. Gradually a pan-imperial visual culture evolves, the beginning of which is formulated during the reign of Augustus, with an apex dur- ing the Antonine Age. The ubiquity of Greek Ideal types among the various genres of Roman sculpture illustrates how completely they were integrated in the visual language of the Empire.
The Social History of Roman Art. Cambridge, , 1. The Social History, Hellenistic and Roman Ideal Sculpture. The Allure of the Classical. Cambridge, , Going up to the Antonine and Sev- eran periods, this visual language formulated in the capital was selec- tively adapted in the provinces, where classical images are adopted by provincial patrons and craftsmen, and often are reworked to new ends.
The idealized classicized representations of deities and per- sonifications attest to the culture spread by the Romans throughout all of the Empire. In this sense, the works offer a valuable example of the periphery — center dialogue during the Roman Imperial Age. Besides, one should not neglect the fact that presence of replicas of classical types is also significant because it grants social acceptance to the owner and bestows upon the patron a sense of cultural identity, of romanitas.
The shared visual language is owed to the presence of the Roman army, of the cities, and of the sponsored by the capital images, even when those were sometimes interpreted alternatively by the local spectators.
Art serves to solidify the common language in the Empire, not only among the part of the population commis- sioning sculptural and other works of art, but also among those who look at them4. And not only the sculptural, but also the oth- er artworks of Balkan provenance corroborate this. Sculpture found here — portraiture and ideal, official, votive, and decorative — prove it.
Replicas and variations based on classical originals, found in our territory, lead to the conclusion that types of Greek Classical sculp- ture were clearly popular and comprehensible to the members of this provincial society during the Roman period. To answer this question one could use votive reliefs with preserved images and inscriptions. These make possible an appraisal of what kind of persons which kind of representations favored for their votives. First I will examine reliefs with representations of rep- licas of Greek classical sculpture, and later of some rendering myths.
Hellenistic and Roman Ideal, , 15, ; Bartman, Elizabeth. Sculptural Col- lecting and Display in the Private Realm. In: Roman Art in the Private Sphere. Elaine Gazda. Ann Arbor, , 78; Stewart, Peter. In the iconographic type Gi- ustini Asklepios is rendered standing, relaxed, on left Fig.
II, supporting leg, a himation thrown over the shoulders. The deity is propped, under the right shoulder, by a staff with a snake; the left hand is flexed, resting on the left hip, covered by the draped cape. The head is slightly twisted to the right; the fastened hair is rendered in big curls, tighter on the beard.
In the Broadlands type Hygieia is rendered standing, frontal, clad in a fastened below the chest chiton, over which is draped a himation. The hairstyle is classical, orderly. The right arm is drawn-out in front of the body below the chest, a snake coiling on it; the left arm is outstretched, likely holding a phiale from which the snake eats. Trakijsko svetilishte na Asklepia do Glava Panega. Georgi Mihailov.
Boris Gerov. Serdica, , , Hygieia in Thracia. Hygieia in Classical Greek Art. Athens, , Ikonografska harakteristika na izobrazheniata na Asklepii varhu trakijskite obrochni relefi.
0コメント